Iglehart V. Board Of County Commissioners Of Rogers County :: 2002 :: Oklahoma Supreme Court Decisions :: Oklahoma Case Law :: Oklahoma Law :: Us Law :: Justia

By today's remand the parties are relegated to their prejudgment status. This would not only infringe upon the rights of legitimate massagists to pursue a chosen occupation, see Meyer v. Nebraska, 262 U. S. 390, 399, 43 625, 626–627, 67 1042, 29 A. L. R. Index of Contents (Sunshine lawsuits. 1446 (1923), but would also pose an impermissible threat to those persons seeking such services. In no event shall any person within the purview of this chapter act as aforesaid without satisfying the training requirement set forth within this section after the effective date of the ordinance codified in this chapter; 50.

Rogers V Board Of Road Commissioners Ga

407 v. Fisk, 232 K. 820, 827, 829, 660 P. 2d 533 (1983). 13 Only if the court should conclude that there is no material fact in dispute and the law favors the movant's claim or liability-defeating defense is the moving party entitled to summary judgment in its favor. Myrick v. Board of Pierce County Com'rs | Cases | Westlaw. In re Schneck, 78 K. 207, 209, 96 P. 43. "The question as to whether the State might interpose the defense of governmental immunity from liability as a bar to recovery in a suit against the State in the court of claims, is essential to the jurisdiction of that court, and the powers and duties of the presiding judge. Acts 1943, waiving immunity for the State by amending section 24 to said court of claims act, apply to suits against counties under the jurisdiction of the circuit court. With the latter, of course, educational standards should be set. ANNOTATIONS subsequent to 191 K. 712 (not annotated to specific clauses).

Rogers V Board Of Road Commissioners Naruc

¶18This argument fails to negate the existence of a material fact issue as to the proximate cause of plaintiffs' injuries. Corp., 261 Conn. 620 (2002). Regarded as continuation where provision of new law same as old. 148 (L) All establishments must be fitted with an overhead sprinkler system for the purpose of fire prevention. Whether a statute repealed by implication is revived by a later repeal of the repealer statute examined. Twenty-Third) Scope and jurisdiction of UCCC; territorial application. Prather, 84 K. 169, 112 P. 829. Cited; statutory definition of "incapacitated person" considered in applying statute of limitations in a medical malpractice case. Rogers v. Board of Road Comm’rs for Kent County –. Repeal of 72-5707 did not relieve county of liability incurred before repeal. Bodwell v. Heaton, 40 K. 36, 38, 18 P. 901; Bennet v. Wolverton, 24 K. 284, 287. Words "in the last sickness" have not acquired any peculiar meaning. ¶21HARGRAVE, C. J., WATT, V. C. J., HODGES, LAVENDER, OPALA, KAUGER, SUMMERS and BOUDREAU, JJ., concur; ¶22.

Rogers V. Board Of Road Commissioners For Kent County

Coleman, 168 K. 159, 163, 211 P. 2d 81. Plaintiffs to Counterclaim in D. United States of America et al. Barten v. Turkey Creek Watershed Joint District No. Tiger will be liable here because he intended for the ball to land on Arnold's property. Continuation of provisions applied to amendments to prohibitory liquor law. Sunflower Racing, Inc. Board of Wyandotte County Comm'rs, 256 K. 426, 440, 885 P. Rogers v board of road commissioners international. 2d 1233 (1994). Water Co. City of Wichita, 98 K. 256, 258, 158 P. 49. § 11-401(A) (effective 1 November 1997) were: A. We must presume that the County prefers not to protect schoolchildren from the dangers inherent in specific hands-on contact from unskilled trainers. Words and phrases shall be construed according to the context and the approved usage of the language, but technical words and phrases, and other words and phrases that have acquired a peculiar and appropriate meaning in law, shall be construed according to their peculiar and appropriate meanings. The instant court reverses the judgment of the lower court and is remanded for further information that is needed to be found by the lower court (damages). Sulzen v. School District, 144 K. 648, 651, 62 P. 2d 880.

Marker v. Preferred Fire Ins. Statutory changes in 38-1602(b)(1) not retroactively applied to juvenile charged before change effective. This is not sufficient justification for disparity in treatment. Equitable Shipyards, Inc. v. State, supra, 93 Wash. 2d at 478, 611 P. 2d 396. 373, 30 148, 54 240. Offering bi-weekly mortgage payment plans held to be debt adjusting; statute construed. William P. Bissett, Jr., et al., Plaintiffs-appellees Cross-appellants, v. Ply-gem Industries, Inc., et al., Defendants-appellantscross-appellees. Co., 6 K. Rogers v board of road commissioners ga. 2d 397, 400, 628 P. 2d 1080 (1981). In summary, I would hold that all the provisions of the ordinance, as amended, except the recordkeeping requirement, bear a rational relationship to the underlying purpose of the resolution. Overruled: Robertson v. Howard 83 K. 453, 112 P. 162. These shortcomings lend further credence to appellants' allegations that the true purpose of this law is to close the massage parlors.